Thursday, July 26, 2012

What's the difference between the "real and ideal" when it comes to breastfeeding?

BREASTFEEDING CONVERSATION: Looking at the
benefits of breastfeeding
Some news articles I've read lately have been ignoring the strongest and most well-researched facts about breastfeeding. The latest example? "The New York Times" published an article titled "The Ideal and the Real of Breast-Feeding," where Jane Brody expresses concern that "the 'breast is best' dogma is creating undeserved guilt and serious hardships for a growing number of new mothers."

I realize that not all moms choose to breastfeed and there are cases when a mom cannot breastfeed for medical reasons. But we and other organizations make it our mission to support moms with information and guidance when they want to breastfeed. That includes helping them in a variety of situations, like breastfeeding at the breast exclusively, breastfeeding at home and pumping while away, exclusive pumping, breastfeeding a baby born premature, and more.

But this "The New York Times" article asserts breastfeeding is a matter of convenience and calls into question the mounds of evidence-based research on the benefits of breastfeeding and the risks of not.

As I see it, here are the facts when it comes to breastfeeding:
  • Breastmilk is the best way to feed a human infant. Breastmilk was made expressly for a human infant and has the exact antibodies and nutrients needed for a baby at every stage of their growth. While substitutions are available, they are in no way equal to breastmilk or breastfeeding.
  • Breastfeeding is natural but does not always come naturally. That is why there are professionals like IBCLCs, CLCs, and other breastfeeding educators whose role is to help a mom and baby breastfeed. Sometimes it does come easier and that is great. But the challenges are surmountable and breastmilk and breastfeeding cannot be replicated.
  • Sticking with breastfeeding, like many other worthwhile things, can be challenging. It is challenging to go back to work when you are breastfeeding. But it is also challenging to go back to work and leave your baby in general. Since our bodies are designed to make breastmilk, we know through a ton of research that it is more beneficial than formula. Why else would formula manufacturers tout that their product is just like breastmilk?
  • The conversation about breastfeeding should not be a discussion that pits mom against mom. When looking at this conversation, it's important to look at the facts and the sources of those facts. Morevover, there needs to be a consistent platform that's clear of promotion about breastfeeding by healthcare professionals so moms can get the relevant facts they need. 
That's my take on this most recent breastfeeding conversation. What's yours?

1 comments:

Angie Luby said...

Breastfeeding should be seen as the norm where only limited amounts of babies are formula fed. We need to keep this mentality to educate moms better on the surpassed benefits for their baby's health, true convenience, and the decreased cost versus formula. We all know smoking is not a healthy choice and we as a nation have no problem making commercials and print ads stating that fact. Is NOT breastfeeding an infant really any different? If breastfeeding were more of a social norm we wouldn't be having this conversation. Let's get some billboards up nationwide showing a woman nursing discretely. I see the ones about not smoking and pregnancy. They are both a health issue.

Post a Comment

To prevent spam, all comments are moderated. Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be reviewed and approved. Thank you.